Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Comic Ads. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Comic Ads. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Greatest Ad Ever?

Người đăng: Unknown on Thứ Bảy, 9 tháng 7, 2011



This one's slightly outside my bailiwick, as it was published in 1954 on the inside front cover of Wings #123, the penultimate issue of that long-running Fiction House title. But it's just so delightfully goofy that I couldn't resist. For starters, let's consider that galloping fellow up top:

He certainly seems happy, but he also appears to be dashing full-tilt to make a train. I suppose the idea is that he's going on a vacation with his well-deserved prize winnings, but why didn't he get to the station on time?

And check out the gal down below:

She looks like she's ready to do anything for that fistful of tens. But all she has to do is solve some exceedingly simple rebuses:

Now, I'm guessing most of you know that Indiana is the Hoosier State, so you wouldn't even need to work out the puzzle. But it's easy to do that as well; SINK + DIAL + ONEA - SOLE - K = INDIANA. It's a breeze!

HAM + CHAIN + ET - HAT - CH = MAINE, which is indeed the Pine Tree State.

That fistful of tens is as good as yours, young lady!

One clear difference between those days and now; note the complete absence of disclaimers and fine print. Back in my younger days I would have been all over this kind of contest, certain that I was going to win the big bucks. Now I look at it with a skeptical eye and assume that either the actual puzzles are much harder than shown or that there would be so many correct entries (and purchases from the National Book Club) that the winners would end up being drawn from a hat.
More about

I Can't Imagine Why An Adolescent Boy Would Want... Oh, Snap!

Người đăng: Unknown on Thứ Hai, 21 tháng 3, 2011


Considering the generally G-rated fare of Silver Age comics, there were certainly enough of these types of advertisement that seemed aimed at more prurient adolescent fantasies than being a superhero. Most of the ads included an attractive woman, just in case your own imagination didn't trigger all the possible uses Spy-Pen or similar devices had for you.

The "scientific optical principle" that the X-ray specs really worked under apparently was simply that a small feather inside the glasses made you think you were seeing something you weren't.

You've gotta love the zombie-like way she's got her hands out in front of her.
More about

Checking the Ad Claims: GT Energy Chamber

Người đăng: Unknown on Thứ Hai, 29 tháng 6, 2009



This ad appeared in Tales of Suspense #92. For only $5.95 you could save a bundle in gas costs. Was it true?

Back then you'd have to really poke around to figure out if it was worth the price, but today thanks to the wonders of the innertubes, I located a review of the product from Jim Dunne and Charles Bishop, back in the 1960s.

#1, get the car they tried all the products on; wow:

He installed the gadgets on our test car, a '68 Olds Cutlass S with a 310-horsepower, 350-cubic-inch V-8, four-speed manual transmission, 3.23:1 final drive ratio, and F70-14 tires. The engine was properly tuned and timed, and we never altered the settings.


Which should explain the baseline mileage and power numbers:

Gas mileage: 10.755 m.p.g. From 25 to 70 m.p.h.: 8.4 seconds.


That's right, under 11 miles per gallon. Ouch! But when they tested the GT Energy Chamber:

This unit is inserted in the gas line between the fuel pump and carburetor, where it is supposed to level out pressure waves in the fuel flow. The ads claim that it enables your engine "to extract more raw, blazing energy and more gasoline economy." The car ran normally in the consumption test but power flattened out at 60 in the acceleration test, with all the symptoms of fuel starvation.
Gas mileage was 10.9 m.p.g. From 25 to 70 m.p.h.: 9.6 seconds.


It got slightly better mileage, but at an obvious cost in terms of acceleration onto the highway. If we assume that gas was running about 35 cents a gallon back then, it would take you 13,000 miles to pay for the device. And the idea of going 30 days on a tank of gas... well, only if you'd previously been going about 29.875 days on that same tank.
More about